Private Advisory Briefing

Premium Finance
Advisory Briefing

Prepared for Marcus Dimyan

Oleavine · Imako · Dr. Bukk  |  E-Commerce

Client Overview

This briefing was prepared specifically for Marcus Dimyan based on publicly available information and details shared during our initial conversation. It is intended to help Marcus evaluate whether a Premium Finance arrangement may be worth exploring further.

Marcus Dimyan

Oleavine / Imako / Dr. Bukk

E-Commerce — Consumer Goods

United States (Nationwide)

LLC Partnerships (Pass-Through Entities)

~$4–5M Gross

~80% Gross Margin

New York & Boston

Marcus Dimyan is the founder and primary operating member of a multi-brand direct-to-consumer e-commerce portfolio. His brands — Oleavine, Imako, and Dr. Bukk — each serve distinct consumer markets within the health, wellness, and cosmetic space, all sold online across the United States.

Oleavine focuses on plant-based, professional-grade skincare formulas — tea tree and neem-infused products for foot and body care. Imako is a cosmetic teeth brand with over 100,000 customers and significant viral traction on social platforms. Dr. Bukk serves a related dental cosmetics niche with a distinct brand voice.

The portfolio operates through two LLC partnerships — one held under an umbrella trust (Marcus only), and one with four partners. Marcus functions as the CEO and primary operator across all entities, with gross revenue in the $4–5M range and margins that reflect a high-efficiency, product-based e-commerce model.

Marcus is a growth-focused entrepreneur who is actively engaged in tax efficiency and wealth strategy. He has an established CPA relationship that handles planning for himself and his family — and he values that relationship. He is not looking to replace his existing advisor; he is looking to complement and expand what is already in place.

His stated priorities include minimizing his personal tax burden, keeping more capital inside the business and personally, and exploring advanced structures that other business owners at his level are using. He describes himself as someone who is "always interested in learning new workarounds" — and he is open to strategies that go beyond traditional retirement accounts.

What Is Premium Finance?

A plain-language explanation of how a Premium Finance arrangement works — and why some business owners choose to have a funding partner help cover the cost of a financial protection program.

Why Would I Have Somebody Else Fund This Program?

A Premium Finance arrangement allows a third-party funding partner to cover the annual cost of a financial protection program on your behalf. Instead of writing a large check out of your own pocket each year, the funding partner handles that payment — and you retain the use of that capital inside your business or personally.

For a business owner like Marcus — running a high-margin e-commerce operation with active reinvestment needs — keeping capital available for inventory, marketing, and growth is a practical priority. Premium Finance is one way to maintain a meaningful financial protection program without pulling that capital out of the business.

The Funding Arrangement in Plain Terms

A Premium Finance structure is a funding arrangement where a third party covers the cost of your financial protection program. The program itself is designed to accumulate value over time — and that accumulated value can serve as collateral for the funding arrangement, reducing the out-of-pocket requirement for the owner.

Over time, if the program performs as designed, the owner may be able to exit the arrangement with the program fully in force — having had outside funding help pay for it along the way. This is not a guarantee, and every arrangement carries risks that must be reviewed carefully before any decision is made.

How a Premium Finance Arrangement Typically Unfolds

01

A financial protection program is designed around your goals, structure, and tax situation.

02

A third-party funding partner covers the annual program cost, rather than the owner paying out of pocket.

03

The program accumulates value over time. That value may serve as collateral for the funding arrangement.

04

At a planned point, the owner reviews options: exit the arrangement, continue, or restructure — based on performance and goals.

Advisory Waypoints

Six areas where a Premium Finance arrangement may be worth exploring, based on Marcus's business model, structure, and stated priorities. These are starting points for conversation — not final recommendations. Any recommendation requires a full review of Marcus's financials, tax situation, and goals.

1

Keep Capital Inside the Business

E-Commerce Reinvestment Priority

E-commerce growth is capital-intensive. Inventory, paid media, and platform fees compete for every available dollar. A Premium Finance arrangement may allow Marcus to maintain a meaningful financial protection program without redirecting capital that could otherwise fund the next product launch or marketing campaign.

2

Potential Tax Advantages for Pass-Through Owners

LLC Partnership Structure

Marcus's businesses are pass-through entities — income flows to his personal return. Certain financial protection programs, when structured correctly, may offer tax-advantaged accumulation and distribution. This is an area where coordination with his existing CPA would be essential before any design is finalized.

3

Protecting the Operator Behind the Business

Key Person & Family Continuity

Marcus is the primary operator across multiple brands. If something were to happen to him, the business could face significant disruption. A well-designed financial protection program can address both personal family continuity and business continuity — simultaneously, through a single structure.

4

Building Tax-Efficient Wealth Outside the Business

Non-Qualified Strategies for Business Owners

Marcus has expressed interest in strategies that go beyond traditional retirement accounts. Certain financial protection programs can accumulate value on a tax-advantaged basis, providing a wealth-building vehicle that is separate from the business — and accessible on a tax-efficient basis in the future.

5

Positioning for a Future Exit or Succession

Multi-Brand Portfolio Considerations

As Marcus's portfolio grows toward and potentially beyond the $5M net worth range, planning for a future exit, sale, or succession becomes increasingly relevant. A financial protection program can serve as a liquidity tool at exit — providing options that are not dependent on the sale price or timing of the business.

6

Coordinating Across Partners and Family Members

Multi-Partner LLC & Family Business Context

Marcus operates with business partners in one of his LLCs, and his family — including his father and brother — are also business owners. A thoughtfully designed financial protection program can be structured to address both Marcus's personal goals and the interests of his business partners and family, without creating conflicts.

Why This May Matter to Marcus

A summary of the potential owner-level benefits of a Premium Finance arrangement, framed around Marcus's specific situation and priorities.

Outside Funding Covers the Program Cost

Rather than writing a large annual check, a funding partner covers the cost of the program. Marcus retains that capital — available for inventory, paid media, or personal use.

Tax-Advantaged Accumulation

When designed correctly, the program may accumulate value on a tax-deferred or tax-advantaged basis — a meaningful benefit for a pass-through owner with a 20–30% effective personal rate.

Complements — Does Not Replace — His CPA

Stefan's role is to work alongside Marcus's existing CPA, not to replace them. Any structure would be coordinated with Marcus's tax advisor to ensure alignment with his overall plan.

Addresses Both Family and Business Continuity

A single, well-designed program can provide financial protection for Marcus's family and address business continuity concerns — without requiring two separate strategies.

Builds Wealth Outside the Business

E-commerce businesses can be volatile. A financial protection program provides a wealth-building vehicle that is separate from the business — reducing concentration risk over time.

Positions Marcus for a Future Exit

As the portfolio grows, having a liquid, tax-efficient asset outside the business gives Marcus more options at exit — whether that is a sale, a partnership transition, or a long-term hold.

Frequently Asked Questions

Plain answers to the questions Marcus is most likely to have — before, during, or after our conversation.

That is a fair question, and it deserves a direct answer. This briefing is not a sales document — it is a starting point for a conversation. Premium Finance is a specific financial arrangement that works well for some business owners and is not appropriate for others. The purpose of our conversation is to determine whether it is worth exploring further for Marcus's specific situation. No recommendation will be made without a full review of his financials, tax structure, and goals — and any recommendation would be coordinated with his existing CPA.

Because capital that stays in your business or your pocket can work for you. For an e-commerce operator like Marcus — where inventory, paid media, and platform costs compete for every available dollar — having a funding partner cover the annual cost of a financial protection program means that capital stays available for reinvestment. The program itself is designed to accumulate value over time, which can serve as collateral for the funding arrangement. The goal is to maintain a meaningful financial protection program without pulling capital out of the business to pay for it.

The most significant risk in a Premium Finance arrangement is that the program does not perform as projected — meaning the accumulated value grows more slowly than expected, or the cost of the funding arrangement increases. If that happens, the owner may need to contribute additional capital to maintain the arrangement, or exit it earlier than planned. This is why every arrangement must be stress-tested, reviewed carefully, and structured with appropriate safeguards. No arrangement should be entered without a clear understanding of the downside scenarios.

That is one of the most important questions for any e-commerce operator to ask. A well-designed Premium Finance arrangement should not create a situation where Marcus is locked out of capital he needs for the business. The structure should be reviewed with that concern explicitly in mind — and any arrangement that creates unacceptable liquidity constraints for the business should not be recommended. Marcus's ability to fund growth, manage inventory, and respond to market opportunities should not be compromised.

Yes — that is one of the more practical aspects of a well-designed financial protection program. A single structure can provide financial protection for Marcus's family in the event of an unexpected outcome, while also serving as a wealth-building vehicle and a business continuity tool. Given that Marcus's father and brother are also business owners, there may be additional planning opportunities across the family — though each situation would need to be reviewed independently.

You should not trust any recommendation that is made before a full review of your situation. Stefan's commitment is to work alongside Marcus's existing CPA — not to replace them — and to present only structures that can be clearly explained, stress-tested, and reviewed by Marcus's existing advisors. If a recommendation cannot withstand that level of scrutiny, it should not be made. Marcus should feel comfortable asking for a second opinion, and Stefan would encourage it.

Potentially, yes — but that is one of the key items that must be reviewed before any recommendation is made. Marcus's structure — two LLC partnerships, one held under an umbrella trust — has specific implications for how a financial protection program can be designed and owned. The interaction between the program, the LLCs, and the trust needs to be carefully mapped before any design is finalized. This is exactly the kind of detail that would be reviewed in a follow-up conversation with Marcus and his CPA.

It should not — and if it does, that is a problem. Stefan's approach is explicitly to work with Marcus's existing CPA, not around them. Any structure that is presented would be shared with Marcus's CPA for review and input. Marcus's CPA has already done significant tax planning work, and any new strategy should build on that foundation — not conflict with it. If Marcus's CPA has concerns about a proposed structure, those concerns should be taken seriously.

Preparing for Our Conversation

To make the most of our time together, it helps to have a few things in mind before we speak. The following questions are not required — they are simply a guide to help focus the conversation on what matters most to Marcus.

What are the most capital-intensive parts of your business right now?

Understanding where Marcus's capital is most actively deployed — inventory, paid media, platform fees, or team — helps determine how much flexibility exists for a financial protection program.

How much capital do you typically keep available as a business reserve?

A Premium Finance arrangement should never compromise Marcus's ability to operate and grow. Knowing his liquidity comfort level helps determine whether the structure is appropriate.

What does your current effective personal tax rate look like, and where would you like it to be?

Marcus has expressed interest in moving his effective rate toward 0–5%. Understanding the current baseline and what strategies are already in place helps identify where a financial protection program may add value.

How are your LLCs and umbrella trust currently structured for tax and ownership purposes?

The interaction between a financial protection program and Marcus's existing LLC and trust structure is one of the most important technical questions. This would be reviewed with his CPA.

How do you think about financial risk — in the business and personally?

Premium Finance carries real risks, including the possibility that the program underperforms projections. Understanding Marcus's risk tolerance is essential before any arrangement is designed.

What does success look like for you in 10–15 years — for the business and personally?

Whether Marcus is building toward a sale, a long-term hold, or a transition to partners affects how a financial protection program should be designed and when it should be structured.

Are there family members or business partners whose financial planning should be considered alongside yours?

Marcus's father and brother are also business owners, and he has business partners in one of his LLCs. There may be planning opportunities across the family and partnership that are worth exploring.

Would you be open to including your CPA in a follow-up conversation once we have a preliminary design to review?

Any recommendation Stefan makes would be designed to work alongside Marcus's existing CPA — not replace them. Early CPA involvement helps ensure the structure is technically sound and consistent with Marcus's overall tax plan.

Notes & Sources

A transparent account of what was confirmed, what was inferred, and what remains to be verified before any recommendation is made.

Confirmed. Imako is a direct-to-consumer cosmetic teeth brand with over 100,000 customers. Products include cosmetic teeth, temporary tooth solutions, and natural dental care items. The site references U.S.-based manufacturing, a 30-day guarantee, and significant social media traction (4M+ TikTok views). Revenue and margin figures were not publicly disclosed on the website.

Confirmed. Oleavine is a plant-based skincare brand focused on tea tree and neem-infused formulas for foot and body care. Products include TheraTree Soap, Body Wash, Lotion, Toner, and Exfoliating Scrub. The brand emphasizes natural, professional-grade, sulfate- and paraben-free formulations. Some products were listed as out of stock at the time of review.

Confirmed. Dr. Bukk is a dental cosmetics brand with a distinct, humorous brand voice. The brand sells cosmetic teeth products and cross-references Imako for cosmetic applications. The site is built on Shopify and appears to be a complementary brand within the same portfolio.

Attempted. The LinkedIn profile at the provided URL was not publicly accessible without authentication. No profile details could be confirmed directly from LinkedIn. All professional details in this briefing are drawn from the executive summary provided by Stefan Belhomme.

Primary source for financial, structural, and personal details. Includes: gross revenue (~$4–5M), margin profile (~80%), LLC partnership structure, umbrella trust, CPA relationship, stated tax goals (0–5% effective rate), and meeting logistics. These details were provided by the advisor and have not been independently verified.

Based on figures shared during Marcus's initial conversation with Stefan. Marcus indicated gross revenue of approximately $4M, with a later reference to 'about five.' Margin of ~80% was stated. These figures have not been independently verified through financial statements or tax returns.

Based on the executive summary. Two LLC partnerships confirmed: one held under an umbrella trust (Marcus only), one with four partners. The specific legal structure of the umbrella trust and the nature of the partnership agreements have not been reviewed.

Based on the executive summary. Estimated personal effective tax rate of 20–30%. Marcus indicated that his businesses report minimal taxable income at the entity level. These figures are estimates and should be verified with Marcus's CPA before any tax-related recommendation is made.

Nothing in this briefing constitutes tax advice. Any tax-related observations are general in nature and based on publicly available information about pass-through entity taxation. All tax-related recommendations must be reviewed and approved by Marcus's CPA before implementation.

General observations about e-commerce cash flow, capital intensity, and owner liquidity concerns are based on widely documented industry patterns and are not specific to Marcus's businesses. They are included to provide context, not as confirmed facts about Marcus's specific situation.